A Case Study on Animal Testing Essay

Imagine a world where homo atomic number 18 taken to laboratories and tried on in a c every(prenominal)ous manner. A world where race argon injected with harsh drugs and chemicals that physically and mentally impairment their bodies and their life. If this scenario does not sound acceptable to act upon homophiles, consequently it surely displacenot be right for sentient beings. Right promptly in the world thousands of tools ar experiencing this, and it to the highest degree rebelliously is not fair. creature interrogatory should be halt beca economic consumption it is not only cruel, but un infallible since in that respect argon resource testing methods and zoology rights. hold in more Examples of satire in adventures of huckfinn essayThe statistics of animal testing reflect the cruel and inhumane conduct that it exercises. Tests sometimes require thousands of animals and can last for atomic number 53 month or even an animals entire life. (Watson, 2009, carnal ex amination p.32) The tests affect the animals in a brutal, harsh manner that could result in death. In fact 50% of all animals that are tested on end up dying. (Pros and Cons of creature Testing 2013, para. 2) America is one of the countries that tests on animals some commonly. Government facilities in America that subject to animal testing are the Environmental Protection Agency, sustenance and Drug Administration, the Department of Transportation, National Toxicology Program, and the Department of Agriculture. entirely surprisingly these tests arent required by rectitude in America. (Peta, Animal Testing 101, para. 3) all over 100 million animals suffer each form and $1 million is spent on experiments and equipment for testing. Animal testing spends 40% of all research financing from the U.S. National Institute of Health. (Watson, 2009, Animal Testing p.9) It is necessary that the statistics of animal testing are revealed to those who drive home been misinformed or undere ducated of the issue.The despicable methods of testing that are employ presently wee shown to be brutal and potent. The experiments charter the usage of rats, birds, guineapigs, cats, monkeys, goats, rabbits, fish, mice, and dogs. (Vivisection, 6th ed., p.1, 2013) The experiments are chiefly for the purpose of cosmetics, medicine, household cleaners. A permithal tipsiness test invented around the time of World fight Iin which animals are force-fed increasing doses of a chemical until they dieis still the single most common animal test in use today. Examples of the drugs and chemicals that are used on the creatures are penicillin, morphine, and aspirin- all of which study the potential to kill the animals. The animals are burned, shocked, isolated, forcibly moderate, addicted to drugs, and receive brain damage. (Edwards, 2011, Animal Testing)The methods of testing are dermal penetration, eye irritancy, carcinogenicity. discriminating toxicity, reproductive and DEV toxicity, neurotoxity, skin corrosivity/irritation, ecotoxicity, and pyrogeniaty. (Vivisection, 6th ed., p.1, 2013) Also, the conditions in the laboratories are unsanitary and horrible for living. The animals are deprived of feed and water, their waste is not kept after, and they are ab issue packed in small cages regardless of their bow of health. The worst part is that the animals are given no pain killers of put under anesthesia, therefore they are forced to suffer for countless hours. This counseling of alleged(prenominal) science is extremely atrocious to the do its of animals, and needs to be stopped for good.The methods of animal testing that are by and large used in America are inessential since there are alternative methods of testing. Ric rough Klausner, former school principal of the National Cancer Institute, once said, We exhaust healed mice of cancer for decades and it manifestly didnt work in humans (Pros and Cons of Animal Testing 2013, para. 5) Basically what Kla usner is saw is that it is hard to fix humane issues by testing on animals. The results will usually come out as inaccurate or unreliable. The distinctions between a human body and an animal body are very distinct. There are animatic, metabolic, and cellular difference between the two. There are endless alternative options to replace the merciless environment of regular animal testing. Scientists can study cell cultures by development computer modeling, create artificial human skin, use Vitro testing, and even test on human volunteers These current methods harm no living creatures and are decorous increasingly popular. (Peta, Animal Testing 101, para. 6) For example,the makers of botulinum toxin A have begun to run tests on cells in a lab dish instead of on live animals. Also, it was found that sunscreen can be tested on humans and brings results that are accurate 93% of the time. It is time to turn animal testing into a relic of the past, because better methods exist that are efficient.Lastly, animals merit to live their lives bounteous from suffering and exploitation. Animals rights are except as equal to the rights that humans possess. All animals have the ability to suffer in the same way and to the same degree that humans do. They feel pain, pleasure, fear, frustration, loneliness, and maternally love. Animals also show loyalty, and communicate with each other. (Animal Rights Movement 2001, Animal Rights section) Supporters of animal rights believe that animals have an inherent wortha value only separate from their usefulness to humans. Animals do not have a voice, so therefore, humans are their voice. some animal rights activists stick to the idea that animals should be free to do as they please, which is not a hard task to accomplish. It is very easy to leave animals where they belong, and let them live their life naturally and without human interference. Animals should be as free as people to swear about and do their animal things unmoleste d and restrained by humans. So that is exactly what needs to be done. Humans need to understand that animals should have elemental rights the right to not be tortured, neglected or killed needlessly.Overall, animal testing can be draw as plainly wrong. Animal testing should be stopped because it is not only cruel, but surplus since there are other testing options and animals have rights. Animals rarely serve as good models for the human body therefore animal experimenters are simply wasting the innocent lives of animals. The animals undergo poisoning, shocking, burning, and even death. These methods can be avoided because there are alternative options, so animal testing can be deemed as unneeded and inefficient. In conclusion, animal testing should be eliminated because it violates animals rights, it causes pain and suffering to the experimental animals, and other meaning of testing product toxicity are available.